Ring PROTECH: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Single, relatively small physical ring in the middle of a disc covering ~700-800 sectors. Discs themselves also carry hidden dummy files called ".tmp" and ".pro" which are housed in a folder called "Protect". | Single, relatively small physical ring in the middle of a disc covering ~700-800 sectors. Discs themselves also carry hidden dummy files called ".tmp" and ".pro" which are housed in a folder called "Protect". | ||
Releases with | Releases with ProRing will also carry the logo on the back and like most Ringed DRM, both it and PROTECH was tied to a single plant. In this case Optrom with SID IFPI L034. | ||
==Dumping== | ==Dumping== | ||
Latest revision as of 09:33, 6 August 2026

General Information
Ring PROTECH, later to renamed to ProRing and sometimes referred to as Ring Protect, was a ring-based copy protection by the Japanese company Ed-contrive and used primarily, if not exclusively, on CD releases from said country from the early to mid 2000s. A version for DVDs have never been encountered and might not exist.
Identification
Single, relatively small physical ring in the middle of a disc covering ~700-800 sectors. Discs themselves also carry hidden dummy files called ".tmp" and ".pro" which are housed in a folder called "Protect".
Releases with ProRing will also carry the logo on the back and like most Ringed DRM, both it and PROTECH was tied to a single plant. In this case Optrom with SID IFPI L034.
Dumping
Follow the Ringed Disc Dumping Guide
Additional Information
If a disc is scanned as being protected with Ring PROTECH / ProRing, but does not have rings, it is either remnants or should be reported.
The name Ring PROTECH has historically been incorrectly conflated with several other, unrelated ring protections such as Sysiphus and Copy-X, likely due to misunderstandings about Ring PROTECH being the name of a specific protection and not a generic term. If you see a non-Japanese disc scanned or submitted with Ring PROTECH, it is likely not Ring PROTECH.